Partner Model
Somaz separates design leadership from local regulatory responsibility. That allows the project to keep a strong architectural direction while still following the correct licensed path in each jurisdiction.
Why clients use this model
Keeps design intent strong across markets
Avoids false promises around local sign-off
Creates a cleaner handoff between concept and compliance
Best fit
Clients and architect partners who need a project to move internationally without losing design clarity or regulatory realism.
How the model is structured
Somaz leads concept, interiors, and package preparation
Local partner reviews, adapts, signs, or submits where required
The compliance role is separated contractually from Somaz primary scope
Related reading
How Architect-Led Remote Design Works
How Somaz scopes, designs, coordinates, and delivers projects remotely without losing architectural judgment or local compliance clarity.
What Somaz Delivers Before Local Permit Submission
A clear explanation of the package Somaz prepares before local sign-off, adaptation, and submission are handled in the relevant jurisdiction.
Frequently asked questions
01
Where local sign-off, adaptation, or submission is required, that responsibility belongs to the appropriately licensed local professional or partner.
02
Not when it is planned correctly. The goal is to define the compliance path early so design and local requirements stay aligned instead of colliding late.
If your project crosses jurisdictions, this is the path to start from.
We will define whether the project needs referral-style partner involvement or coordinated partner delivery.
Start a project